[Your Name, Rank/Title]
[Unit/Branch], [Installation]
[Date]
To Whom It May Concern,
Opening & Incident Context
I respectfully submit this letter on behalf of PFC Harris, who recently received a positive result on a mandatory Army urinalysis. In the U.S. Army's zero-tolerance policy, such outcomes are treated with utmost seriousness and can lead to administrative or punitive action. However, Harris is not the type of soldier defined by a momentary lapse - he is honest, accountable, and has immediately taken steps to address the issue.
Life Stressors & Mental Health
Over recent months, Harris has faced considerable personal pressures. He has been enrolled in evening college courses, working part-time to support himself, and managing financial burdens under tight deadlines, all while maintaining full-time duty. This convergence led to mounting anxiety. In a private conversation, Harris shared, "The stress got to me - I made a mistake I regret." His candid acknowledgment demonstrates both self-awareness and a commitment to change. It's well known that anxiety, when left unmanaged, can lead to uncharacteristic decisions. Harris' transparent admission of his own stress underscores his resilience and sense of responsibility.
Accountability & Remedial Efforts
From the moment the positive result was confirmed, Harris took ownership. He immediately:
- Requested a full review of the urinalysis chain of custody - proper procedure is critical for an accurate outcome.
- Enrolled in counseling services to manage his anxiety and life stressors.
- Voluntarily took a second drug test (where policy allows) to ensure fairness in evaluating his situation.
- Actively documented academic, medical, and professional efforts to demonstrate commitment, integrity, and transparency.
These are not minimal actions - they reflect a soldier fighting for his future and career, prepared to face consequences and prove his worth.
Character, Service, & Comparative Value
Prior to this incident, Harris exemplified dedication: punctual attendance, superior PT scores, exemplary drill conduct, and regular completion of duties without incident. In my experience leading junior enlisted soldiers, I place Harris in the top 10% for dependability and maturity. A similar case from a JAG source advises that first-time positivity, when coupled with responsibility and proven character, can justify retention and continued service.
Why We Should Retain Him
Anomaly, not pattern: This is the first known violation in his record.
Personal accountability: Harris has shown decisive action to address and prevent recurrence.
Potential to serve: He remains mission-capable and deeply committed to the Army's core values.
Studies show that for first-time offenders with strong character, retention often serves the best interests of both Soldier and Service.
Conclusion & Recommendation
PFC Harris has made a grave error, but more importantly, he has owned it, confronted it, and is working toward resolution. I strongly recommend that the command consider retaining him with appropriate accountability. He's expressed genuine remorse, is actively pursuing counseling, and fully comprehends the gravity of his duties. Given his prior performance, moral integrity, and willingness to change, I believe strongly that Harris can continue to serve honorably.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone/email] for any further information or discussion.
Respectfully,
[Your Name, Rank/Title]
[Unit/Branch]
